Aqeel Ahmad

 I feel as though I reside in a country where talented and critical-thinking youth are not afforded platforms to ask questions, provide answers, and guide others. Instead, those who act as mere pawns for the elites seem to effortlessly achieve their desired positions, such as public speakers, motivational speakers, and heads of NGOs, among others. It is difficult to find individuals who are independent operators, working for genuine causes without being subservient to politicians or influential figures, or without following an agenda that restricts freedom of choice and promotes a specific narrative. And If you think you are independent while thinking and acting then let me know. 

In contemplating the world, I find that true understanding lies not solely in what our eyes perceive, but in the faculties of our minds. The eyes can be fallible, susceptible to deception and misjudgment, whereas the trained mind possesses the capacity for rationality and discernment. While others may behold a society seemingly brimming with love, joy, and happiness, is that truly the complete picture? What remains concealed from our sight? A haunting question persists within me: the realization that the world we inhabit may not align with its surface appearance. It becomes evident that the hardships of others' lives elude casual observation. The collective suffering and agony endured by the masses often go unnoticed. To truly comprehend the state of an individual, one must delve deep into their heart and mind, seeking to understand their joys, sorrows, and the essence of their being. The mere surface, perceptible by the naked eye, represents merely the tip of the iceberg, while th...

The use of ideology and religion as tools by the elite can be analyzed through the lens of International Relations theories. One such theory is the Realist perspective, which views power as the driving force in international politics. According to this theory, the elite may use ideology and religion to justify their power and maintain their dominance over society. Realist theorists argue that the ruling elite in a society have a vested interest in preserving their power and that they will use any means necessary to do so. Ideology and religion can be powerful tools in this regard, as they can shape public opinion and legitimize the actions of the ruling elite. For example, a ruling class may use nationalism as an ideology to justify their control over a particular territory or population, while at the same time portraying any opposition to their rule as a threat to national security. Similarly, the use of religion can also be analyzed through the Realist lens. Religious beliefs and pra...

Many people have a tendency to believe that they possess more knowledge and wisdom than those around them. Even those who acknowledge that they do not know everything often still maintain a sense of superiority, believing that they are wise for recognizing their own limitations. However, the reality is that intelligence and critical thinking cannot be quantified or measured in any meaningful way. Each individual has their own sphere of knowledge and experience, which is invisible to others and even to themselves. While some people may have a wider range of knowledge and a more developed critical thinking ability, it is impossible to accurately assess the size or scope of anyone's bubble of understanding. In essence, everyone believes they possess a complete understanding of the world based on their own unique perspective, but in reality, we all exist within our own bubbles of knowledge and perception. Sometimes, people believe that they have thought more deeply or thoroughly than o...

Aqeel -Ahmad Reasons for Truth Resistance There are several reasons why people may resist accepting certain truths or facts. Some of the main reasons include: Confirmation bias: People tend to seek out and interpret information in a way that confirms their existing beliefs and biases. Cognitive dissonance: Accepting new information that contradicts one's existing beliefs can cause discomfort and mental stress, known as cognitive dissonance. Fear of change: Accepting new information may require people to change their behavior or beliefs, which can be difficult and uncomfortable. Lack of understanding or knowledge: People may not understand or have enough information about a certain topic to form an informed opinion. Social pressure: People may conform to the beliefs and opinions of their social group or community, even if those beliefs are not based on facts or evidence. Emotionally charged issues: When the topic is emotionally charged, people may be more likely to reject facts ...

Aqeel -Ahmad Why some people follow politicans blindly  There are a variety of reasons why some people may follow politicians blindly. Some possible factors include: Lack of critical thinking skills:  Some individuals may not have the ability or desire to critically evaluate political claims and may instead accept what politicians say without question. Emotion-based decision making:  People may be drawn to certain politicians based on emotions such as fear, anger, or hope, rather than rational analysis. This can make them more likely to follow politicians blindly. Lack of information:  Some individuals may not have access to accurate and reliable information about politicians and their policies, which can make it difficult for them to make informed decisions. Social influence :  People may follow politicians blindly due to social pressure or because they want to conform to the beliefs of those around them. Political polarization :  In some cases, people may...

Aqeel -Ahmad       The Tragedy of Great Power Politics is a book by John Mearsheimer, a political scientist at the University of Chicago. In the book, Mearsheimer argues that the fundamental cause of war in the international system is the existence of great powers, and that the only way to prevent war is to create a system of bipolarity, where there are only two great powers. He contends that in a bipolar system, the two great powers are deterred from going to war with one another because they would be aware that doing so would result in mutually assured destruction. Mearsheimer's theory is based on the idea of offensive realism, which states that states are primarily concerned with their own security, and that they will always seek to maximize their power in order to ensure their survival. In the context of international politics, this means that states will always be looking to expand their territory and influence, and that this quest for power is the primary driver of ...