Ideology and Religion as Tools of the Elite: An International Relations Perspective

The use of ideology and religion as tools by the elite can be analyzed through the lens of International Relations theories. One such theory is the Realist perspective, which views power as the driving force in international politics. According to this theory, the elite may use ideology and religion to justify their power and maintain their dominance over society.

Realist theorists argue that the ruling elite in a society have a vested interest in preserving their power and that they will use any means necessary to do so. Ideology and religion can be powerful tools in this regard, as they can shape public opinion and legitimize the actions of the ruling elite. For example, a ruling class may use nationalism as an ideology to justify their control over a particular territory or population, while at the same time portraying any opposition to their rule as a threat to national security.

Similarly, the use of religion can also be analyzed through the Realist lens. Religious beliefs and practices can be used to legitimize the actions of the elite and to reinforce the existing power structure. For example, religious leaders may promote the idea that the existing social and economic order is ordained by God, thereby justifying the status quo and reinforcing the power of the ruling elite.

In addition to Realism, other theories of International Relations such as Constructivism and Critical Theory also provide insights into how ideology and religion can be used as tools by the elite. Constructivists argue that beliefs and ideas shape international politics, and that the elite may use ideology and religion to shape public opinion and influence the behavior of other actors in the international system. Critical theorists, on the other hand, focus on how power is distributed in society and how it is used to maintain the status quo. They argue that the ruling elite may use ideology and religion to reinforce their power and to maintain the existing social and economic order.

Reference: 

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.

Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155.

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1). University of California Press.

Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage.

Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: neoliberalism and global order. Seven Stories Press.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (Vol. 1). Pantheon.

Kaldor, M. (2003). Global civil society: an answer to war. Polity Press.

Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.

Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, norms, and decisions: on the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge University Press.